Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005, David S. Miller wrote:
But by in large, if a stateless alternative ever exists to
get the same performance benefit as TOE, it will undoubtedly
be preferred by the Linux networking maintainers, by in large.
So you TOE guys are fighting more than an uphill battle.
It does not exist today AFAIK. The hope of such a solution will prevent
the inclusion of TOE technology that exists today?
TOE has a solid track record of being a point-in-time solution with
decreased features and increased maintenance headaches.
This implies that there have been many TOEs in circulation in the past, can
you give a list of the ones you've had experience with and explain how
maintaining them has been a headache? We could definitely learn from past
mistakes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
