net-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v6] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v6] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v6] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v6] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v6] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v6] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v6] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v6] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v6] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v7] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v7] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v7] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v8] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v9] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v10] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v10] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v10] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v11] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v11] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v12] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v12] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v12] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v12] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v12] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v12] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v12] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v12] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v12] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v12] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v12] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v13] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v14] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v14] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v14] duke
  • Integrated: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections Volkan Yazici
• RFR: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config [v2] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config [v3] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config [v3] duke
  • Integrated: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config Michael McMahon
• RFR: 8351843: change open/test/jdk/com/sun/net/httpserver/simpleserver/RootDirPermissionsTest.java to a manual test serhiysachkov
  • Re: RFR: 8351843: change test/jdk/com/sun/net/httpserver/simpleserver/RootDirPermissionsTest.java to a manual test [v2] serhiysachkov
  • Re: RFR: 8351843: change test/jdk/com/sun/net/httpserver/simpleserver/RootDirPermissionsTest.java to a manual test [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8351843: change test/jdk/com/sun/net/httpserver/simpleserver/RootDirPermissionsTest.java to a manual test [v2] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8351843: change test/jdk/com/sun/net/httpserver/simpleserver/RootDirPermissionsTest.java to a manual test [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8351843: change test/jdk/com/sun/net/httpserver/simpleserver/RootDirPermissionsTest.java to a manual test serhiysachkov
• RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v2] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v2] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v2] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v2] Robert Engels
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v2] Bernd
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v2] Robert Engels
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v3] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v3] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v3] Robert Engels
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v3] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v3] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v4] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v4] beppo-sturmtief
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v4] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v4] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v4] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v4] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v4] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v4] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v4] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v5] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v5] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v5] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v5] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v5] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v5] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v5] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v6] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v6] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v7] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v7] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v7] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v7] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v7] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v8] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v8] Michael McMahon
  • Integrated: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN Volkan Yazici
• RFR: 8351897: Extra closing curly brace typos in Javadoc Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8351897: Extra closing curly brace typos in Javadoc Iris Clark
  • Re: RFR: 8351897: Extra closing curly brace typos in Javadoc Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8351897: Extra closing curly brace typos in Javadoc Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8351897: Extra closing curly brace typos in Javadoc [v2] Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8351897: Extra closing curly brace typos in Javadoc Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8351897: Extra closing curly brace typos in Javadoc Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8351897: Extra closing curly brace typos in Javadoc [v3] Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8351897: Extra closing curly brace typos in Javadoc [v3] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8351897: Extra closing curly brace typos in Javadoc [v3] Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8351897: Extra closing curly brace typos in Javadoc [v2] Archie Cobbs
  • Integrated: 8351897: Extra closing curly brace typos in Javadoc Archie Cobbs
• RFR: 8351419: java.net.http: Cleanup links in HttpResponse and module-info API doc comments Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8351419: java.net.http: Cleanup links in HttpResponse and module-info API doc comments Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8351419: java.net.http: Cleanup links in HttpResponse and module-info API doc comments [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8351419: java.net.http: Cleanup links in HttpResponse and module-info API doc comments Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8351419: java.net.http: Cleanup links in HttpResponse and module-info API doc comments [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8351419: java.net.http: Cleanup links in HttpResponse and module-info API doc comments [v2] Michael McMahon
  • Integrated: 8351419: java.net.http: Cleanup links in HttpResponse and module-info API doc comments Daniel Fuchs
• RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads snake66
  • Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads snake66
  • Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads Antonio Vieiro
  • Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads snake66
  • Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads snake66
  • Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads [v2] snake66
  • Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads [v2] Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads [v2] duke
  • Integrated: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads snake66
  • Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads Erik Joelsson
  • Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads [v2] snake66
  • Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads snake66
  • Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads Magnus Ihse Bursie
• RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v2] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v2] Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v3] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v5] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v5] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v5] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v5] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v5] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v4] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v6] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v6] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v7] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v8] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v8] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v9] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v10] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v10] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v12] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v12] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v12] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v13] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v13] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v13] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v14] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v15] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v15] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v16] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v16] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v16] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v16] Sean Mullan
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v16] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v17] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v18] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v19] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v19] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v20] Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v20] Daniel Fuchs
  • Integrated: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages Michael McMahon
• Bug in java.net.http.WebSocket (?) Fischer, Simon
  • Re: Bug in java.net.http.WebSocket (?) Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: Bug in java.net.http.WebSocket (?) Simon Fischer

• Earlier messages
• Later messages