net-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8344188: Cleanup sun.net.www.protocol.jar.JarFileFactory after JEP 486 integration Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8344188: Cleanup sun.net.www.protocol.jar.JarFileFactory after JEP 486 integration Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8344188: Cleanup sun.net.www.protocol.jar.JarFileFactory after JEP 486 integration Daniel Fuchs
  • Integrated: 8344188: Cleanup sun.net.www.protocol.jar.JarFileFactory after JEP 486 integration Eirik Bjørsnøs
• RFR: 8344228: Revisit SecurityManager usage in java.net.http after JEP 486 integration Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8344228: Revisit SecurityManager usage in java.net.http after JEP 486 integration Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8344228: Revisit SecurityManager usage in java.net.http after JEP 486 integration Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8344228: Revisit SecurityManager usage in java.net.http after JEP 486 integration [v4] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8344228: Revisit SecurityManager usage in java.net.http after JEP 486 integration Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8344228: Revisit SecurityManager usage in java.net.http after JEP 486 integration [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8344228: Revisit SecurityManager usage in java.net.http after JEP 486 integration [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8344228: Revisit SecurityManager usage in java.net.http after JEP 486 integration [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8344228: Revisit SecurityManager usage in java.net.http after JEP 486 integration [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8344228: Revisit SecurityManager usage in java.net.http after JEP 486 integration [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8344228: Revisit SecurityManager usage in java.net.http after JEP 486 integration [v4] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8344228: Revisit SecurityManager usage in java.net.http after JEP 486 integration [v4] Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8344228: Revisit SecurityManager usage in java.net.http after JEP 486 integration Daniel Fuchs
• RFR: 8344185: Remove calls to SecurityManager in sun.net.ftp Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8344185: Remove calls to SecurityManager in sun.net.ftp Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8344185: Remove calls to SecurityManager in sun.net.ftp Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8344185: Remove calls to SecurityManager in sun.net.ftp Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8344185: Remove calls to SecurityManager in sun.net.ftp Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8344185: Remove calls to SecurityManager in sun.net.ftp Daniel Fuchs
  • Integrated: 8344185: Remove calls to SecurityManager in sun.net.ftp Eirik Bjørsnøs
• RFR: 8342811: java/net/httpclient/PlainProxyConnectionTest.java failed: Unexpected connection count: 5 Volkan Yazıcı
  • Re: RFR: 8342811: java/net/httpclient/PlainProxyConnectionTest.java failed: Unexpected connection count: 5 Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8342811: java/net/httpclient/PlainProxyConnectionTest.java failed: Unexpected connection count: 5 [v3] Volkan Yazıcı
  • Re: RFR: 8342811: java/net/httpclient/PlainProxyConnectionTest.java failed: Unexpected connection count: 5 [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8342811: java/net/httpclient/PlainProxyConnectionTest.java failed: Unexpected connection count: 5 [v3] Volkan Yazıcı
  • Re: RFR: 8342811: java/net/httpclient/PlainProxyConnectionTest.java failed: Unexpected connection count: 5 [v3] Volkan Yazıcı
  • Re: RFR: 8342811: java/net/httpclient/PlainProxyConnectionTest.java failed: Unexpected connection count: 5 [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8342811: java/net/httpclient/PlainProxyConnectionTest.java failed: Unexpected connection count: 5 [v3] duke
  • Re: RFR: 8342811: java/net/httpclient/PlainProxyConnectionTest.java failed: Unexpected connection count: 5 [v2] Volkan Yazıcı
  • Integrated: 8342811: java/net/httpclient/PlainProxyConnectionTest.java failed: Unexpected connection count: 5 Volkan Yazıcı
• RFR: 8344191: Build code should not have classpath exception Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344191: Build code should not have classpath exception Abdelhak Zaaim
  • Re: RFR: 8344191: Build code should not have classpath exception Jonathan Gibbons
  • Re: RFR: 8344191: Build code should not have classpath exception Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344191: Build code should not have classpath exception David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8344191: Build code should not have classpath exception [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344191: Build code should not have classpath exception [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Withdrawn: 8344191: Build code should not have classpath exception duke
• RFR: 8343877: Test AsyncClose.java intermittent fails - Socket.getInputStream().read() wasn't preempted Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8343877: Test AsyncClose.java intermittent fails - Socket.getInputStream().read() wasn't preempted Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8343877: Test AsyncClose.java intermittent fails - Socket.getInputStream().read() wasn't preempted Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8343877: Test AsyncClose.java intermittent fails - Socket.getInputStream().read() wasn't preempted [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8343877: Test AsyncClose.java intermittent fails - Socket.getInputStream().read() wasn't preempted [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8343877: Test AsyncClose.java intermittent fails - Socket.getInputStream().read() wasn't preempted SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8343877: Test AsyncClose.java intermittent fails - Socket.getInputStream().read() wasn't preempted Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8343877: Test AsyncClose.java intermittent fails - Socket.getInputStream().read() wasn't preempted [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8343877: Test AsyncClose.java intermittent fails - Socket.getInputStream().read() wasn't preempted [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8343877: Test AsyncClose.java intermittent fails - Socket.getInputStream().read() wasn't preempted [v2] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8343877: Test AsyncClose.java intermittent fails - Socket.getInputStream().read() wasn't preempted [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8343877: Test AsyncClose.java intermittent fails - Socket.getInputStream().read() wasn't preempted [v2] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8343877: Test AsyncClose.java intermittent fails - Socket.getInputStream().read() wasn't preempted Mark Sheppard
  • Integrated: 8343877: Test AsyncClose.java intermittent fails - Socket.getInputStream().read() wasn't preempted Jaikiran Pai
• RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages Jonathan Gibbons
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages Jonathan Gibbons
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages Iris Clark
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v2] Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v2] Iris Clark
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v2] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v3] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v3] Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v3] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v4] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v4] Christian Stein
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v4] Iris Clark
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v4] Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages [v4] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Integrated: 8344056: Use markdown format for man pages Magnus Ihse Bursie
• URLClassPath.JarLoader::checkJar just became obsolete Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: URLClassPath.JarLoader::checkJar just became obsolete Daniel Fuchs
• JDK-8019345, RFC3986, RFC2396 and java.net.URI Peter Firmstone
  • Re: JDK-8019345, RFC3986, RFC2396 and java.net.URI Alan Bateman
  • Re: JDK-8019345, RFC3986, RFC2396 and java.net.URI Peter Firmstone
  • Re: JDK-8019345, RFC3986, RFC2396 and java.net.URI Peter Firmstone
• RFR: 8342075: HTTP/2 ConnectionWindowUpdateSender may miss some unprocessed DataFrames from closed streams Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8343855: HTTP/2 ConnectionWindowUpdateSender may miss some unprocessed DataFrames from closed streams [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8343855: HTTP/2 ConnectionWindowUpdateSender may miss some unprocessed DataFrames from closed streams [v2] Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8343855: HTTP/2 ConnectionWindowUpdateSender may miss some unprocessed DataFrames from closed streams [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8343855: HTTP/2 ConnectionWindowUpdateSender may miss some unprocessed DataFrames from closed streams [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8343855: HTTP/2 ConnectionWindowUpdateSender may miss some unprocessed DataFrames from closed streams [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8343855: HTTP/2 ConnectionWindowUpdateSender may miss some unprocessed DataFrames from closed streams [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8343855: HTTP/2 ConnectionWindowUpdateSender may miss some unprocessed DataFrames from closed streams [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8343855: HTTP/2 ConnectionWindowUpdateSender may miss some unprocessed DataFrames from closed streams [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8343855: HTTP/2 ConnectionWindowUpdateSender may miss some unprocessed DataFrames from closed streams [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8343855: HTTP/2 ConnectionWindowUpdateSender may miss some unprocessed DataFrames from closed streams [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8343855: HTTP/2 ConnectionWindowUpdateSender may miss some unprocessed DataFrames from closed streams [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8343855: HTTP/2 ConnectionWindowUpdateSender may miss some unprocessed DataFrames from closed streams [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8343855: HTTP/2 ConnectionWindowUpdateSender may miss some unprocessed DataFrames from closed streams [v4] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8343855: HTTP/2 ConnectionWindowUpdateSender may miss some unprocessed DataFrames from closed streams [v5] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8343855: HTTP/2 ConnectionWindowUpdateSender may miss some unprocessed DataFrames from closed streams [v5] Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8343855: HTTP/2 ConnectionWindowUpdateSender may miss some unprocessed DataFrames from closed streams Daniel Fuchs
• RFR: 8343411: Test fail on Windows due to "An established connection was aborted by the software in your host machine" Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8343411: Test fail on Windows due to "An established connection was aborted by the software in your host machine" Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8343411: Test fail on Windows due to "An established connection was aborted by the software in your host machine" Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8343411: Test fail on Windows due to "An established connection was aborted by the software in your host machine" Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8343411: Test fail on Windows due to "An established connection was aborted by the software in your host machine" Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8343411: Test fail on Windows due to "An established connection was aborted by the software in your host machine" Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8343411: Test fail on Windows due to "An established connection was aborted by the software in your host machine" Daniel Jeliński
• RFR: 8318442: java/net/httpclient/ManyRequests2.java fails intermittently on Linux Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8318442: java/net/httpclient/ManyRequests2.java fails intermittently on Linux Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8318442: java/net/httpclient/ManyRequests2.java fails intermittently on Linux [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8318442: java/net/httpclient/ManyRequests2.java fails intermittently on Linux [v2] Martin Doerr
  • Re: RFR: 8318442: java/net/httpclient/ManyRequests2.java fails intermittently on Linux [v2] Lutz Schmidt
  • Re: RFR: 8318442: java/net/httpclient/ManyRequests2.java fails intermittently on Linux [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8318442: java/net/httpclient/ManyRequests2.java fails intermittently on Linux [v2] Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8318442: java/net/httpclient/ManyRequests2.java fails intermittently on Linux Matthias Baesken
  • Integrated: 8318442: java/net/httpclient/ManyRequests2.java fails intermittently on Linux Matthias Baesken
• RFR: 8343482: Remove unnecessary @SuppressWarnings annotations (net) Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8343482: Remove unnecessary @SuppressWarnings annotations (net) [v2] Archie Cobbs
  • Re: RFR: 8343482: Remove unnecessary @SuppressWarnings annotations (net) [v2] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8343482: Remove unnecessary @SuppressWarnings annotations (net) [v2] Archie Cobbs
  • Integrated: 8343482: Remove unnecessary @SuppressWarnings annotations (net) Archie Cobbs
• RFR: 8343442: Add since checker tests to the networking area modules Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8343442: Add since checker tests to the networking area modules [v2] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8343442: Add since checker tests to the networking area modules [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8343442: Add since checker tests to the networking area modules [v2] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8343442: Add since checker tests to the networking area modules [v2] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8343442: Add since checker tests to the networking area modules [v3] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8343442: Add since checker tests to the networking area modules [v3] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8343442: Add since checker tests to the networking area modules [v3] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8343442: Add since checker tests to the networking area modules [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8343442: Add since checker tests to the networking area modules [v3] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8343442: Add since checker tests to the networking area modules [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8343442: Add since checker tests to the networking area modules [v3] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8343442: Add since checker tests to the networking area modules [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8343442: Add since checker tests to the networking area modules [v3] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8343442: Add since checker tests to the networking area modules [v3] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8343442: Add since checker tests to the networking area modules [v4] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8343442: Add since checker tests to the networking area modules [v5] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8343442: Add since checker tests to the networking area modules [v5] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8343442: Add since checker tests to the networking area modules [v5] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8343442: Add since checker tests to the networking area modules [v5] Nizar Benalla
  • Re: RFR: 8343442: Add since checker tests to the networking area modules [v5] Nizar Benalla
  • Integrated: 8343442: Add since checker tests to the networking area modules Nizar Benalla
• RFR: 8343433: Update net.properties and java.net.http module-info.java after 8326949 Michael McMahon
  • Re: RFR: 8343433: Update net.properties and java.net.http module-info.java after 8326949 Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8343433: Update net.properties and java.net.http module-info.java after 8326949 Jaikiran Pai
  • Integrated: 8343433: Update net.properties and java.net.http module-info.java after 8326949 Michael McMahon
• RFR: 8342958: Use jvmArgs consistently in microbenchmarks Claes Redestad
  • Re: RFR: 8342958: Use jvmArgs consistently in microbenchmarks Eric Caspole
  • Re: RFR: 8342958: Use jvmArgs consistently in microbenchmarks Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8342958: Use jvmArgs consistently in microbenchmarks Jorn Vernee
  • Re: RFR: 8342958: Use jvmArgs consistently in microbenchmarks Claes Redestad
  • Re: RFR: 8342958: Use jvmArgs consistently in microbenchmarks Andrey Turbanov
  • Re: RFR: 8342958: Use jvmArgs consistently in microbenchmarks Claes Redestad
  • Re: RFR: 8342958: Use jvmArgs consistently in microbenchmarks Claes Redestad
  • Integrated: 8342958: Use jvmArgs consistently in microbenchmarks Claes Redestad
  • Re: RFR: 8342958: Use jvmArgs consistently in microbenchmarks Emanuel Peter
  • Re: RFR: 8342958: Use jvmArgs consistently in microbenchmarks Claes Redestad
• RFR: 8342868: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in core libs Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8342868: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in core libs Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8342868: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in core libs David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8342868: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in core libs Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8342868: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in core libs Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8342868: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in core libs Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8342868: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in core libs Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8342868: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in core libs [v2] Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8342868: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in core libs [v2] Naoto Sato
  • Re: RFR: 8342868: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in core libs [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8342868: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in core libs [v2] Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8342868: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in core libs [v2] Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8342868: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in core libs [v2] Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8342868: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in core libs [v2] Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8342868: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in core libs [v2] Julian Waters
  • Re: RFR: 8342868: Errors related to unused code on Windows after 8339120 in core libs [v2] Julian Waters
• RFR: 8342827: Fix order of @param tags in other modules Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8342827: Fix order of @param tags in other modules Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8342827: Fix order of @param tags in other modules Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8342827: Fix order of @param tags in other modules Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8342827: Fix order of @param tags in other modules Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8342827: Fix order of @param tags in other modules Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8342827: Fix order of @param tags in other modules [v2] Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Integrated: 8342827: Fix order of @param tags in other modules Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8342827: Fix order of @param tags in other modules [v2] Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8342827: Fix order of @param tags in other modules [v2] Joe Darcy
  • Re: RFR: 8342827: Fix order of @param tags in other modules [v2] Joe Wang
  • Re: RFR: 8342827: Fix order of @param tags in other modules [v2] Hannes Wallnöfer
  • Re: RFR: 8342827: Fix order of @param tags in other modules [v2] Iris Clark
  • Re: RFR: 8342827: Fix order of @param tags in other modules [v2] Jaikiran Pai
• RFR: 8342807: Update links in java.base to use https:// Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8342807: Update links in java.base to use https:// Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8342807: Update links in java.base to use https:// [v2] Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8342807: Update links in java.base to use https:// Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8342807: Update links in java.base to use https:// Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8342807: Update links in java.base to use https:// Eirik Bjørsnøs

• Earlier messages
• Later messages