net-dev
Thread
Date
Earlier messages
Later messages
Messages by Thread
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v6]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v6]
Jaikiran Pai
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v6]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v6]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v6]
Jaikiran Pai
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v6]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v6]
Jaikiran Pai
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v6]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v6]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v7]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v7]
Jaikiran Pai
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v7]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v8]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v9]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v10]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v10]
Jaikiran Pai
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v10]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v11]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v11]
Jaikiran Pai
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v12]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v12]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v12]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v12]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v12]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v12]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v12]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v12]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v12]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v12]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v12]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v13]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v14]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v14]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections [v14]
duke
Integrated: 8350279: HttpClient: Add a new HttpResponse method to identify connections
Volkan Yazici
RFR: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config [v2]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config [v2]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config [v3]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config [v3]
duke
Integrated: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351601: [JMH] test UnixSocketChannelReadWrite failed for 2 threads config
Michael McMahon
RFR: 8351843: change open/test/jdk/com/sun/net/httpserver/simpleserver/RootDirPermissionsTest.java to a manual test
serhiysachkov
Re: RFR: 8351843: change test/jdk/com/sun/net/httpserver/simpleserver/RootDirPermissionsTest.java to a manual test [v2]
serhiysachkov
Re: RFR: 8351843: change test/jdk/com/sun/net/httpserver/simpleserver/RootDirPermissionsTest.java to a manual test [v2]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8351843: change test/jdk/com/sun/net/httpserver/simpleserver/RootDirPermissionsTest.java to a manual test [v2]
duke
Re: RFR: 8351843: change test/jdk/com/sun/net/httpserver/simpleserver/RootDirPermissionsTest.java to a manual test [v2]
Jaikiran Pai
Integrated: 8351843: change test/jdk/com/sun/net/httpserver/simpleserver/RootDirPermissionsTest.java to a manual test
serhiysachkov
RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v2]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v2]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v2]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v2]
Mark Sheppard
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v2]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v2]
Mark Sheppard
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v2]
Robert Engels
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v2]
Bernd
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v2]
Robert Engels
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v2]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v3]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v3]
Mark Sheppard
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v3]
Robert Engels
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v3]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v3]
Mark Sheppard
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v4]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v4]
beppo-sturmtief
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v4]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v4]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v4]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v4]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v4]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v4]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v4]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v5]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v5]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v5]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v5]
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v5]
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v5]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v5]
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v5]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v5]
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v5]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v6]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v6]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v7]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v7]
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v7]
Mark Sheppard
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v7]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v7]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v8]
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN [v8]
Michael McMahon
Integrated: 8351339: WebSocket::sendBinary assume that user supplied buffers are BIG_ENDIAN
Volkan Yazici
RFR: 8351897: Extra closing curly brace typos in Javadoc
Archie Cobbs
Re: RFR: 8351897: Extra closing curly brace typos in Javadoc
Iris Clark
Re: RFR: 8351897: Extra closing curly brace typos in Javadoc
Archie Cobbs
Re: RFR: 8351897: Extra closing curly brace typos in Javadoc
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8351897: Extra closing curly brace typos in Javadoc [v2]
Archie Cobbs
Re: RFR: 8351897: Extra closing curly brace typos in Javadoc
Naoto Sato
Re: RFR: 8351897: Extra closing curly brace typos in Javadoc
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8351897: Extra closing curly brace typos in Javadoc [v3]
Archie Cobbs
Re: RFR: 8351897: Extra closing curly brace typos in Javadoc [v3]
Chen Liang
Re: RFR: 8351897: Extra closing curly brace typos in Javadoc [v3]
Archie Cobbs
Re: RFR: 8351897: Extra closing curly brace typos in Javadoc [v2]
Archie Cobbs
Integrated: 8351897: Extra closing curly brace typos in Javadoc
Archie Cobbs
RFR: 8351419: java.net.http: Cleanup links in HttpResponse and module-info API doc comments
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8351419: java.net.http: Cleanup links in HttpResponse and module-info API doc comments
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8351419: java.net.http: Cleanup links in HttpResponse and module-info API doc comments [v2]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8351419: java.net.http: Cleanup links in HttpResponse and module-info API doc comments
Volkan Yazici
Re: RFR: 8351419: java.net.http: Cleanup links in HttpResponse and module-info API doc comments [v2]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8351419: java.net.http: Cleanup links in HttpResponse and module-info API doc comments [v2]
Michael McMahon
Integrated: 8351419: java.net.http: Cleanup links in HttpResponse and module-info API doc comments
Daniel Fuchs
RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads
snake66
Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads
David Holmes
Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads
snake66
Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads [v2]
Magnus Ihse Bursie
Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads
Antonio Vieiro
Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads
Magnus Ihse Bursie
Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads
snake66
Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads
Magnus Ihse Bursie
Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads
snake66
Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads [v2]
snake66
Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads [v2]
Erik Joelsson
Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads [v2]
Magnus Ihse Bursie
Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads [v2]
duke
Integrated: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads
snake66
Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads
Erik Joelsson
Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads
Magnus Ihse Bursie
Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads
David Holmes
Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads
Magnus Ihse Bursie
Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads [v2]
Magnus Ihse Bursie
Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads [v2]
David Holmes
Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads [v2]
snake66
Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads [v2]
Magnus Ihse Bursie
Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads [v2]
Magnus Ihse Bursie
Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads [v2]
David Holmes
Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads
snake66
Re: RFR: 8351322: Parameterize link option for pthreads
Magnus Ihse Bursie
RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v2]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v2]
Andrey Turbanov
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v3]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v5]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v5]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v5]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v5]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v5]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v4]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v6]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v6]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v7]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v8]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v8]
Alan Bateman
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v9]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v10]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v10]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11]
Mark Sheppard
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11]
Mark Sheppard
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11]
Mark Sheppard
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11]
Mark Sheppard
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11]
Mark Sheppard
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11]
Alan Bateman
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11]
Mark Sheppard
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11]
Alan Bateman
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11]
Mark Sheppard
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v11]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v12]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v12]
Mark Sheppard
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v12]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v13]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v13]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v13]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v14]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v15]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v15]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v16]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v16]
Sean Mullan
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v16]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v16]
Sean Mullan
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v16]
Alan Bateman
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v17]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v18]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v19]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v19]
Daniel Fuchs
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v20]
Michael McMahon
Re: RFR: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages [v20]
Daniel Fuchs
Integrated: 8348986: Improve coverage of enhanced exception messages
Michael McMahon
Bug in java.net.http.WebSocket (?)
Fischer, Simon
Re: Bug in java.net.http.WebSocket (?)
Daniel Fuchs
Re: Bug in java.net.http.WebSocket (?)
Simon Fischer
Earlier messages
Later messages