On Fri, 27 Feb 2026 15:58:55 GMT, Daniel Fuchs <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I see. I'm assuming this is the most economic — in terms of, not just LoC, >> but also complexity — way to inform tests about this unexpected condition. > > yes - otherwise you would have to read the logs in order to notice the stack > trace there, because simply dropping the packet will typically not make the > test to fail (it did not in our case, hence the reason it went unnoticed). We should probably have a list of exception types that should *not* close the exception instead. But that probably deserves a separate ticket. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29956#discussion_r2872081744
