On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 13:34:02 GMT, Daniel Fuchs <[email protected]> wrote:
>> we probably could. This test should work equally well with a `send` instead >> of `sendAsync` too. But the proposed change is good enough for now. > > @sendaoYan is this test run with a timeout factor > 1 in the configuration > where it fails? > If so a possibility could also be to use `Utils.adjustTimeout` to adjust the > timeout with the timeout factor. I see from the log that timeoutFactor is 2.0 - so if the test passes with a timeout of 20 instead of 10, using `Utils.adjustTimeout` might be preferable as it will extend the timeout on those configurations where timeoutFactor is even greater. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27447#discussion_r2372378492
