On Fri, 23 May 2025 06:14:37 GMT, Daniel Jeliński <djelin...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> We observed a case where the instants returned by `TimeSource.now()` were >> returned in non-monotonic order. The reason was that sometimes we were using >> a delay calculated with one `localSource` as an input to a different >> (updated on another thread) `localSource`. This was confirmed by putting >> `assert firstNanos + delay == nanos;` under `instant(long, long)`. >> >> The fix ensures that we won't accidentally use the incorrect delay by >> removing the `instant(long, long)` overload, and calculating the delay in >> the method where it is used. >> >> No new test; instrumenting this class for testing would likely double its >> size. Tier2 tests continue to pass. > > Daniel Jeliński has updated the pull request incrementally with one > additional commit since the last revision: > > Move localSource comment Thanks for the reviews! ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25390#issuecomment-2904180546
