On Fri, 3 May 2024 13:38:10 GMT, robert engels <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> and people have made do I think there is cause for this level of analysis. Specifically * This API, while part of the JDK, is not in widespread professional use * The intended use-case of the API is now "reducing the "getting startup" effort to serve up a web page." [1][2] So in that context - that its always going to be a "new" API to those we hope to make use of it - stuff like conceptual gaps (the length is CHUNKED_CONTENT) and footguns (the method that is safer to use is more characters and is named in a way that requires context on how http servers work, not just what they do) at least **feels** important. [1]: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2024-January/118266.html [2]: https://openjdk.org/jeps/408 ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18955#discussion_r1589236458
