On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 07:54:19 GMT, Daniel Fuchs <dfu...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> @jaikiran the only reservation I have is that the new wording makes it look > like the default implementation of `ServerSocket` methods is going to call > `SocketImpl::getOption(SocketOption<>)` while in fact it still calls > `SocketImpl::getOption(SocketOptions)`. I think the proposal is okay. It just specifies that set/gets the socket options, it doesn't specify whether it calls the SocketImpl's setOption(int, Object) or setOption(SocketOption, Object) methods. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18646#issuecomment-2044655847
