On Thu, 3 Aug 2023 12:34:14 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <[email protected]> wrote:

>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/net/InetAddress.java line 791:
>> 
>>> 789:      * {@linkplain InetAddress#getAddress() IP address} using the 
>>> system-wide
>>> 790:      * {@linkplain InetAddressResolver resolver}. This is a best 
>>> effort method,
>>> 791:      * meaning we may not be able to return the fully qualified domain 
>>> name; in
>> 
>> I think you'll need to replace "we" with "it" here. It may also be useful to 
>> expand this sentence a bit, maybe with an example of why it may fail. 
>> 
>> I also wonder (and I'm in two minds on this) is if this method should 
>> include an impNote to say what it actually does.
>
> Hello Alan,
> 
>> I also wonder (and I'm in two minds on this) is if this method should 
>> include an impNote to say what it actually does.
> 
> I'm guessing that you are thinking of having the implNote state that a 
> reverse name lookup will be performed by this method using the system-wide 
> resolver. Right now, the `getHostName()` says this:
> 
> 
> * <p>If this InetAddress was created with a host name,
>      * this host name will be remembered and returned;
>      * otherwise, a reverse name lookup will be performed
>      * and the result will be returned based on the system
>      * configured resolver. If a lookup of the name service
>      * is required, call
>      * {@link #getCanonicalHostName() getCanonicalHostName}.
> 
> 
> I think we could update the `getCanonicalName()` to mention the reverse name 
> lookup. However, I'm unsure if it should be an `implNote` or just formal API 
> javadoc.

I have now updated the PR to add a few more details on what this method does 
and why it might fail.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/15134#discussion_r1283158724

Reply via email to