On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 12:12:37 GMT, Daniel Jeliński <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Daniel Fuchs has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
>> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes 
>> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains two additional 
>> commits since the last revision:
>> 
>>  - Merge branch 'master' into TimeSource
>>  - 8309939
>
> src/java.net.http/share/classes/jdk/internal/net/http/common/TimeSource.java 
> line 41:
> 
>> 39:  * of monotonicity than the {@link System#nanoTime()} it is based on.
>> 40:  */
>> 41: public final class TimeSource implements InstantSource {
> 
> Given that all instances of TimeSource are essentially the same (through the 
> use of shared `nanoSource`), can we add a private constructor and make this 
> class a singleton?

Good point. That's an oversight.

> src/java.net.http/share/classes/jdk/internal/net/http/common/TimeSource.java 
> line 46:
> 
>> 44:     private static final TimeSource SOURCE = new TimeSource();
>> 45: 
>> 46:     private static final class NanoSource implements InstantSource {
> 
> This class doesn't need to implement InstantSource

Good point

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14450#discussion_r1229547997
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14450#discussion_r1229547152

Reply via email to