On Fri, 30 Sep 2022 11:51:34 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <j...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Good point. The JBS issue should be marked with `noreg-self` too. > > Hello Mark, it hasn't always been clear to me when to update the `@bug`. The > contribution guide isn't completely clear either. So I usually update the bug > id if the test change is substantial (in the way it affects the test). In > this case, I've now taken Alan's suggestion to include the `8284161` (the > one which introduced the test for feature testing) along with the current bug > id `8294610`. I am willing to drop the `8294610` from the `@bug` if there's > some agreement towards it. > > Alan has marked the JBS issue as `noreg-self`, so that's been taken care of. I think adding the original 8284161 is sufficient, but remove 8294610 as the convention has been not to include a test fix bugid in the @bug statement ... this is a correction I've had to apply in the past ------------- PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10504
