> On 26 Jun 2020, at 14:38, Pavel Rappo <pavel.ra...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Rahul,
>
> Won't that start retaining the URL fragment? From
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6455#section-3
>
> Fragment identifiers are meaningless in the context of WebSocket URIs
> and MUST NOT be used on these URIs. As with any URI scheme, the
> character "#", when not indicating the start of a fragment, MUST be
> escaped as %23.
I don’t think that a a fragment will be retained, see
182 null); // No fragment
, but maybe the concern is that a fragment character can be sneaked into other
parts of the URI components, like the query? If so, then the test could be
expanded to ensure that this cannot happen.
-Chris.
