> On 26 Jun 2020, at 15:10, Pavel Rappo <pavel.ra...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Chris, > > Currently (i.e. before the proposed change has been applied) the fragment is > NOT retained. This is because of the requirement of the mentioned RFC > section. The proposed change seems to overlook that detail. Hence, my > question. D’oh! Pavel is correct. I was reading the diffs the wrong way round ! -Chris.
- RFR 8245245 : WebSocket can loose the URL encoding of URI qu... Rahul Yadav
- RFR 8245245 : WebSocket can loose the URL encoding of U... Rahul Yadav
- Re: RFR 8245245 : WebSocket can loose the URL encod... Pavel Rappo
- Re: RFR 8245245 : WebSocket can loose the URL e... Rahul Yadav
- Re: RFR 8245245 : WebSocket can loose the U... Daniel Fuchs
- Re: RFR 8245245 : WebSocket can loose ... Pavel Rappo
- Re: RFR 8245245 : WebSocket can loose ... Chris Hegarty
- Re: RFR 8245245 : WebSocket can loose the URL e... Chris Hegarty
- Re: RFR 8245245 : WebSocket can loose the U... Pavel Rappo
- Re: RFR 8245245 : WebSocket can loose ... Chris Hegarty