> On 26 Jun 2020, at 15:10, Pavel Rappo <pavel.ra...@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Chris,
> 
> Currently (i.e. before the proposed change has been applied) the fragment is 
> NOT retained. This is because of the requirement of the mentioned RFC 
> section. The proposed change seems to overlook that detail. Hence, my 
> question.

D’oh! Pavel is correct. I was reading the diffs the wrong way round !

-Chris.

Reply via email to