Hi Alan.
Alright. I've transformed the second note in an @see:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/webrev_8237896/webrev.02/
best regards,
-- daniel
On 29/01/2020 08:20, Alan Bateman wrote:
If someone has a MulticastSocket then they can't get to a
DatagramChannel to use the alternative join method that is recommended
to them. If we do JDK-8237191 [1], then I think there will be a more
complete migration story for the API note. For now, the API note that
you have for the class description is okay but I think we should leave
out the proposed note for the method description (a @see is okay of
course).
-Alan
[1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8237191
