Re: RFR:8194298 Add support for per Socket configuration of TCP keepalive

[Alan Bateman]

On 15/05/2018 08:35, Langer, Christoph wrote:

I’m asking because I’m planning to add some AIX options and will have 
to choose a name for this implementation eventually.

@Alan: What do you think?


Yes, I agree it should be renamed. Vyom has just finalized the CSR so I 
assume the final points around the implementation and naming of the JDK 
internal classes can be sorted out while the CSR is in progress.

-Alan.