Bernd,
I'll add a test for SO_SNDBUF. These parameters are too system dependent
to use hard coded values in the tests though. I'm not sure you could depend
on the initial/default value never being the same as the maximum value
either.
Thanks,
Michael
On 09/12/2016, 11:31, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
Should the test maybe assert that a change was made (or maybe be a bit
more whitebox and assert the result is >64k? Should it test SND+RCV?
Gruss
Bernd
--
http://bernd.eckenfels.net
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 12:04 PM +0100, "Michael McMahon"
<michael.x.mcma...@oracle.com <mailto:michael.x.mcma...@oracle.com>>
wrote:
Could I get the following change reviewed please?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~michaelm/8170920/webrev.1/
Thanks,
Michael.
