On 14/08/2014 14:23, Claes Redestad wrote:
How about methods only taking beginIndex? Integer.parseInt("x:
10000000", 3, 10)? I guess these could to be dropped
to avoid ambiguity and instead allow for variations where radix can be
left out.
I think there are two alternatives to the current implementation:
- only keep parseInt(CharSequence s, int beginIndex, int endIndex, int
radix)
That's my preference, and core-libs-dev would be the place to move the
discussion.
-Alan.
- optional radix: parseInt(CharSequence s, int beginIndex, int
endIndex), parseInt(CharSequence s, int beginIndex, int endIndex, int
radix)
(Should this discussion be moved to core-libs-dev?)
/Claes
