On 12/06/2014 20:15, Michael McMahon wrote:
It would be possible to change the error back, but what about
supportedOptions() - what should
that return? It doesn't seem right that it would include an option
that cannot be used and how do
we test it, if we can't tell whether the option is usable or not?
Maybe it depends on how these privileges get configured, which is
something I'm looking into,
but if it's a case that specific user attributes need to be configured
on a system, then I'm not sure
we can count on that for our test systems.
On platforms where the support option is supported then I would think
that supportedOptions should include it, otherwise I could imagine users
getting confused by the UOE. For the tests then having them pass then
the option is supported but can't be set due to lack of privileges seems
reasonable to me. I guess it's a subjective and maybe others might have
opinions on this.
-Alan.
