Thank you very much for clarification!
Best regards,
Piotr
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Chris Hegarty <chris.hega...@oracle.com>wrote:
> On 05/07/2013 02:59 PM, Piotr Bzdyl wrote:
>
>> Chris,
>>
>> When I used the URL provided by you I have indeed access to my bug
>> report. It seems the notification email I got with confirmation of my
>> report submission provides the misleading URL. Is it possible to fix it
>> in the notification template?
>>
>
> You are right the URL provided to you is pretty much useless, at this
> point. Not that is matters much, but there are separate JIRA projects for
> bugs moving from web screening to the "real" bug incidents. If it is any
> consolation, your issue has made it all the way ;-)
>
>
>
>> When I debug the code (using the test case I attached to the bug
>> report), it doesn't go into the
>>
>> if (streaming() && strOutputStream == null) {
>> writeRequests(); // <<<< Here
>> }
>>
>> but goes directly to expect100Continue() in:
>> if (expectContinue) {
>> expect100Continue();
>> }
>>
>
> Ah ha. that is the bug. We should always writeRequests ( write headers )
> when expectContinue is set. I'll update the bug with this clear comment,
> and then propose a patch for JDK8.
>
> -Chris.
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Chris Hegarty <chris.hega...@oracle.com
>> <mailto:chris.hegarty@oracle.**com <chris.hega...@oracle.com>>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Piotr,
>>
>> Your bug is accessible at
>>
>> http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug._**_do?bug_id=8012625<http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.__do?bug_id=8012625>
>>
>>
>> <http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.**do?bug_id=8012625<http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8012625>
>> >
>>
>> From my reading of the code the headers should be sent before
>> waiting for the reply to continue.
>>
>> From sun/net/www/prtotocol/http/__**HttpURLConnection:
>>
>>
>> getOutputStream() {
>> ....
>> if (!checkReuseConnection())
>> connect();
>>
>> boolean expectContinue = false;
>> String expects = requests.findValue("Expect");
>> if ("100-Continue".__**equalsIgnoreCase(expects)) {
>>
>> http.setIgnoreContinue(false);
>> expectContinue = true;
>> }
>>
>> if (streaming() && strOutputStream == null) {
>> writeRequests(); // <<<< Here
>> }
>>
>> if (expectContinue) {
>> expect100Continue();
>> }
>> ....
>>
>> }
>>
>> Are you seeing something different?
>>
>> -Chris.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 05/07/2013 02:25 PM, Piotr Bzdyl wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This is my first post to this mailing list so I would like to
>> say "Hi".
>>
>> The reason I subscribed and I am writing is that I believe I
>> have found
>> a bug in sun.*.HttpURLConnection class (in particular how it
>> handles
>> Expect: 100-continue header). I have already submitted a bug at
>> bugs.sun.com <http://bugs.sun.com> <http://bugs.sun.com> but
>>
>> after almost 3 weeks I still
>>
>> cannot access the bug and check its status
>> (http://bugs.sun.com/__**bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug___**
>> id=9001773<http://bugs.sun.com/__bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug___id=9001773>
>>
>> <http://bugs.sun.com/**bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_**id=9001773<http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=9001773>
>> >).
>>
>>
>> I would like to ask if bugs.sun.com <http://bugs.sun.com>
>> <http://bugs.sun.com> is alive or if
>>
>> it is possible to report the bug in the OpenJDK project or is
>> there any
>> other alternative procedure for submitting bug reports.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Piotr Bzdyl
>>
>>
>>
