On Mar 27, 5:30pm, chris.hega...@oracle.com (Chris Hegarty) wrote: -- Subject: Re: DefaultProxySelector socks override
| On 03/27/2013 05:22 PM, chris...@zoulas.com wrote: | > .... | > Sure, I just requested a subscription to net-dev so I might not see the | > first few messages. To clarify: | > | > 1. I will add socks.proxyHost and socks.proxyPort for consistency | > with the other protocols, leaving as is socksProxyHost and | > socksProxyPort for compatibility. | > 2. I will add socks.nonProxyHosts and not socksNonProxyHosts. | > | > Is that what you had in mind? | | Re-checking the code I take back my previous comment. We already have | | socksProxyHost, socksProxyPort, socksProxyVersion | | so your original proposal of 'socksNonProxyHosts' is probably best, and | consistent with existing properties. I concur. Nothing for me to do :-) Best, christos
