Not to derail this highly relevant thread, and forgive my ignorance, but what's the issue with IPv6 multihoming?
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019, 10:01 PM Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.li...@gmail.com wrote: > ... and of all those, once you solve v6 multihoming (possibly with ipv9) > do come back to nanog where I'm sure it will be operational. > > On 18/02/19, 8:23 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Michel Py" < > nanog-boun...@nanog.org on behalf of michel...@tsisemi.com> wrote: > > > Viruthagiri Thirumavalavan wrote : > > I solved the email spam problem. > > Oh, this is wonderful news. > There are plenty of other problems that need your brilliance. In no > specific order : > > - Global warming. > - Nuclear proliferation. > - Peace in the middle east. > - World hunger. > - IPv6 multihoming. > > We will be looking for your next improvement. > > TSI Disclaimer: This message and any files or text attached to it are > intended only for the recipients named above and contain information that > may be confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, > you must not forward, copy, use or otherwise disclose this communication or > the information contained herein. In the event you have received this > message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this > message, and then delete all copies of it from your system. Thank you!... > > > >
