There is that.
On 2/9/19 3:27 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
The biggest use of bandwidth as the IoT buzzword comes to fruition is
exploits.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp><https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Miles Fidelman" <mfidel...@meetinghouse.net>
*To: *"Mike Hammett" <na...@ics-il.net>
*Cc: *nanog@nanog.org
*Sent: *Saturday, February 9, 2019 2:26:13 PM
*Subject: *Re: Last Mile Design
I expect things are going to change as IoT takes off - security
cameras, baby monitors, start to push video upstream - that makes a
difference.
And then there are the efforts of cell carriers to push traffic onto
home wifi - more and more facetime video will also add load.
Miles
On 2/9/19 3:14 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Electrical consumption of the equipment is different and then the
environmental conditioning that larger electronic load.
Let's not forget that actual consumer bit consumption changes very
little whether they have 20 megs or 2 gigs provisioned and available.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL><https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb><https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions><https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix><https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange><https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
<https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp><https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Miles Fidelman" <mfidel...@meetinghouse.net>
*To: *nanog@nanog.org
*Sent: *Saturday, February 9, 2019 12:20:36 PM
*Subject: *Re: Last Mile Design
Speaking of which, the Grant County Public Utility District
(Washington
State), has wired active ethernet all over their rural county.
Seems to me that the cost difference between splitters & switches
is a
pretty minor component of deploying FTTH - the costs are in the
trenching, and the fiber. What you put on the poles, or in the lawn
furniture, is a pretty minor cost component. Though... getting
power to
the switches might be an issue, less so if you're deploying on
power poles.
Miles Fidelman
On 2/9/19 12:59 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2019, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>> If I had to build a consumer broadband network and had the budget
>> (and owned the fibre) to do so, I'd definitely always choose
Active-E:
>
> For anyone saying it's "impossible" to do AE they're welcome
here to
> the nordic region and especially Sweden where PON is basically
unheard
> of. We have millions of AE connected households. I live in one
of them.
>
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
