I should probably have mentioned that in this sense I view “urban” as exclusive 
to “single family homes” - meaning I’m talking about high density modern urban 
with under grounding requirements - and high rise residential towers.

We are the opposite, we are presently enterprise, midsize, and exotic-small 
business only, and have no residential arm or support structure (or SLA 
expectations, or standards or lack thereof) of a residential connection.

-Ben.

-Ben Cannon
CEO 6x7 Networks & 6x7 Telecom, LLC 
b...@6by7.net <mailto:b...@6by7.net>




> On Feb 9, 2019, at 2:54 AM, Baldur Norddahl <baldur.nordd...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> PON in urban areas absolutely makes sense. Maybe less in a high rise area, 
> where each building can have a small building wide network of its own. But it 
> in areas with single family homes PON is king.
> 
> Our POPs can have up to 10 000 customers each. All on a single 96 fiber 
> strand cable leading into the POP building. We have extra ducts, but nothing 
> that would allow us to change that to a point to point network. That would 
> require 100x that 96 fiber cable.
> 
> With extra ducts it would be possible to rebuild from PON to point to point. 
> But it would require massive investments. Basically you would have to invest 
> all that we saved by building PON. For starters, you would have to have many 
> more POPs.
> 
> And yes, there are splitters in the hand holes. This is not what stops you 
> from rebuilding from PON. It is the fact that we never paid for extra fiber. 
> The backbone in a sub area is typically build with a 24 fiber strand cable. 
> Because fibers are not free and are actually quite expensive as the number of 
> fibers grow and the distances get longer. We can do a few point to point 
> connections, for example if we need to deliver a commercial service or for 
> our own needs (to connect POPs etc).
> 
> We are not big on commercial services. But if we were, I would use WDM 
> splitters for that. Or the long awaited 10G PON if that ever arrives and 
> turns out at a price point that works.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Baldur
>  

Reply via email to