+1! On 30/01/2019, 22:10, "NANOG on behalf of Ren Provo" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Thomas, You probably should remove sessions with networks explicitly *not* participating in route servers versus displaying them on a global shame list. Cheers, -ren On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 5:06 PM Thomas King <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi all, Thanks for your support! This helps us getting all peers on the new IPv4 space. Our looking glass shows which peers already have changed the IP settings (see section “BGP session established”) and which peers are still working on it (see section “BGP sessions down”): https://lg.de-cix.net/routeservers/rs1_nyc_ipv4#sessions-up Best regards, Thomas From: NANOG <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of James Stankiewicz <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Wednesday, 30. January 2019 at 19:32 To: Jared Mauch <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: Calling LinkedIn, Amazon and Akamai @ DE-CIX NY Microsoft an Edgecast has not yet made there changes. On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 12:20 PM Jared Mauch <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Akamai is working on doing our part. Apologies. Sent from my iCar On Jan 30, 2019, at 12:02 PM, Mehmet Akcin <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Pinged my contacts in each On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 05:52 Jason Lixfeld <[email protected]<mailto:jason%[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, In late October 2018, DE-CIX announced that they would be renumbering their IPv4 address block in New York between 01-28-19 and 01-30-19. This was followed by numerous reminders in months, weeks and even days leading up to the renumbering activity. The renumbering activity has come and gone, but LinkedIn, Amazon and Akamai are still using the old IPs. If three months has gone by and the numerous reminders that have been sent have resulted in these organizations still living on the old IP space, it seems to me that there may be some sort of a disconnect between who receives the notifications from IXPs and how they are filtered upstream. I’m hopeful that the eyeballs who read this list are some of those folks who should have received the notifications from DE-CIX, or can at least filter the info back downstream to whoever can perform the renumbering activity. Thanks. -- Mehmet +1-424-298-1903 -- Jim Stankiewicz Principal Network Architect NJEdge W:855.832.EDGE(3343) c:201.306.4409 [https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0B15Cb24EwZVsOUhIa0lWbG9ZT2c&revid=0B15Cb24EwZVsdVB2SlJ3ekFEUllPRDZyMGZ5cUtkbko2bWQ0PQ]
