There are many other threads on this topic as well. I can say +1 for check_mk though.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 7:24 AM Faisal Imtiaz <fai...@snappytelecom.net> wrote: > Having done a full circle on the number of network monitoring packages, > dealing with pro's and con's, we ended up with using Check_mk, moreover > OMD.... http://omdisto.org > > We found (OMD) this to be a very powerful combination of different > packages, each can shine for it's own strength and other compliments it for > for the weaknesses ! > > Regards. > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > http://www.snappytelecom.net > > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 > > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Colton Conor" <colton.co...@gmail.com> > *To: *"nanog list" <nanog@nanog.org> > *Sent: *Wednesday, August 15, 2018 9:49:12 AM > *Subject: *What NMS do you use and why? > > We are looking for a new network monitoring system. Since there are so > many operators on this list, I would like to know which NMS do you use and > why? Is there one that you really like, and others that you hate? > For free options (opensouce), LibreNMS and NetXMS come highly recommended > by many wireless ISPs on low budgets. However, I am not sure the commercial > options available nor their price points. > >
