I don't want to over-state it, but 'number of prefices' slways feels to me like a potential mis-measure. Not that you don't want to know it, but % of announced space for a given origin-as feels like it might be closer to the story, because there can be so many different ways to announce it as dis- and super aggregates.
-G On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Job Snijders <j...@ntt.net> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 01:27:09PM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote: >> > Markus Weber from KPN is generating a daily report here and drew >> > similar conclusions: https://as286.net/data/ana-invalids.txt Markus >> > scrapes all routes from the AS 286 PEs and marks the routes for >> > which no valid or unknown alternative exists as "altpfx=NONE". >> >> Thanks. Protein. >> >> So the numbers are not that far off from when I last checked this back >> in 2016, i.e., less than 1% of the total IPv4 routing table. >> >> Do you have numbers for IPv6, out of interest? > > There are ~ 330 IPv6 invalids in the DFZ, and for 70 of those no > alternative covering prefix exists. > > Kind regards, > > Job
