On 13/Jul/18 18:37, Job Snijders wrote: > That is exactly what I mean. Because of the golden rule "most-specific > always wins" (and parts of the AS_PATH are pretty easy to spoof) it > only makes sense to me to completely reject invalid routes. Exactly my preference, and exactly what we did for 2 years. But in practice, customers don't really like this, nor does your CFO. We need mass deployment for this to work effectively, and also a bit more education for those that sign aggregates but not the more-specifics. Mark.
- deploying RPKI based Origin Validation Job Snijders
- Re: deploying RPKI based Origin Validation Mark Tinka
- Re: deploying RPKI based Origin Validation Job Snijders
- Re: deploying RPKI based Origin Valida... Mark Tinka
- Re: deploying RPKI based Origin Va... Grant Taylor via NANOG
- Re: deploying RPKI based Orig... Christopher Morrow
- Re: deploying RPKI based ... Job Snijders
- Re: deploying RPKI ba... Mark Tinka
- Re: deploying RPKI based ... Grant Taylor via NANOG
- Re: deploying RPKI ba... Christopher Morrow
- Re: deploying RPKI ba... Mark Tinka
- Re: deploying RPKI ba... Baldur Norddahl
- Re: deploying RPKI ba... Mark Tinka
- Re: deploying RPKI ba... Job Snijders
- Re: deploying RPKI ba... Mark Tinka
- Re: deploying RPKI ba... Job Snijders
- Re: deploying RPKI ba... George Michaelson
- Re: deploying RPKI ba... Mark Tinka