> On Jun 19, 2018, at 11:55 PM, Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us> wrote: > > On 6/19/18 8:48 PM, Jared Mauch wrote: >> MikroTik is getting there but most people are just not enabling it either. > > > RouterOS still has "will not fix" IPv6 bugs, so that doesn't help shops > dependent on Mikrotik want to move forward with deploying it. I know. They’re very popular in the WISP and FTTH communities that are doing sub-10G as their aggregate bits. I understand the price appeal but not a fan personally. - Jared
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: Need ... Matt Harris
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was Re: ... Job Snijders
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was ... Rubens Kuhl
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? was ... Ca By
- Re: IPv6 faster/better proof? ... Job Snijders
- Re: IPv6 faster/better pro... Ca By
- Re: IPv6 faster/bette... Job Snijders
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Jared Mauch
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Seth Mattinen
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Jeremy Austin
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Jared Mauch
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Mark Tinka
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Mike Hammett
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Mark Tinka
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Mark Tinka
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Mark Tinka
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Mark Tinka
- Re: IPv6 faster/b... Jared Mauch