What about my right to not have this crap on NANOG? On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 2:03 PM, Zbyněk Pospíchal <zby...@dialtelecom.cz> wrote:
> Dne 17/05/2018 v 18:14 Sander Steffann napsal(a): > > Hi, > > > > But this regulation increases essential liberty for individuals, so I > don't understand your argument... > > No, it don't. It has two aspects: > > 1. It brings new positive defined rights. But as with any other positive > defined rights, it brings an obligation for anyone other to provide such > rights, it requires enforcement, inspections/whatever which anyone in > Europe must pay from taxes and it requires implementation of a lot of > rules, possible changing of existing internal systems etc. etc. in > companies which will be paid from their revenue, so again from consumer > money. > > 2. It would be the true in an ideal situation. In the real world, there > is no ideal situation. Accept the fact that if you would like to keep > any data private, you must not tell them to anyone. You. You are the one > who can decide about your data and who can really protect your data, no > one else, no government, no GDPR. There is a lot of anonymization > techniques, strong encryption and other things helping to cover who > used/published/steal your private data when it is done by experienced > professionals. It could help a little bit to keep private data protected > againest beginner and intermediate data thieves and perhaps againest > some kinds of stupid mistakes, maybe. Nothing more. Is it enough when we > mention all the costs, including hidden? I don't think so. > > > BTW, nobody told me he is going to propose such regulation before the > last EP elections, no party I have been able to vote has anything like > this nor oposing anything like this in their program. > > -- > Regards, > Zbynek > -- Fletcher Kittredge GWI 207-602-1134 www.gwi.net
