I had a very clueless ATT salesperson tell me yesterday that “Our company policy is we don’t do BGP sessions.” I have a client wanting to use ATT as an upstream and they won’t do BGP (mainly due to clueless sales). If this is the level of comp tenancy then good luck. :-)
Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net --- http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth http://www.midwest-ix.com COO/Chairman Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric > On Feb 8, 2017, at 9:05 AM, Van Dyk, Donovan via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> > wrote: > > We’ve been running into a lot of problems lately with ATT peering lately. > Level3 included. > > We have multiple carriers and most of them have run into this issue over the > past couple months where there is congestion between ATT and our carriers, it > appears there is a political issue on who should pay for the peering and > bandwidth. > My colleague says he heard on the grapevine (Horrible source I know) that ATT > is playing super hardball and requesting big cash for peering with them. > > Anyways, that’s all I got. > > Cheers > > -- > Donovan Van Dyk > > > > > The information contained in this electronic mail transmission and its > attachments may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. > If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient (or an individual > responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you are strictly > prohibited from copying, disseminating or distributing this communication. If > you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender > immediately and destroy all electronic, paper or other versions. > > > On 2/5/17, 8:21 PM, "david peahi" <davidpe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > We're seeing frequent dropped packets between ATT and Level 3 in Atlanta > with traffic sourced from an ATT user destined for Microsoft Office 365, > making Office 365 apps unusable during critical business hours. Anyone else > have this problem with ATT? > >
