If I could have it my way, I would say no gTLD’s should be allowed to transmit any email messages whatsoever. And force them to either use something like sendgrid.com or to purchase a primary .com, .org, .net .co.uk whatever etc..
But thats just me. It’s not a nice world but it is just the world we live in today. > On Dec 2, 2016, at 05:28, Hugo Salgado-Hernández <hsalg...@nic.cl> wrote: > > According to a 2015 paper, 85% of new gTLDs domains was some form > of parking, defensive redirect, unused, etc: > <http://conferences2.sigcomm.org/imc/2015/papers/p381.pdf> > > Hugo > > On 15:02 01/12, J. Hellenthal wrote: >> 99% ? That's a pretty high figure there. >> >> -- >> Onward!, >> Jason Hellenthal, >> Systems & Network Admin, >> Mobile: 0x9CA0BD58, >> JJH48-ARIN >> >> On Dec 1, 2016, at 14:56, Rich Kulawiec <r...@gsp.org> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 05:34:26PM -0000, John Levine wrote: >>> [...] 800,000 domain names used to control it. >> >> 1. Which is why abusers are registrars' best customers and why >> (some) registrars work so very hard to support and shield them. >> >> 2. As an aside, I've been doing a little research project for a >> few years, focused on domains. I've become convinced that *at least* >> 99% of domains belong to abusers: spammers, phishers, typosquatters, >> malware distributors, domaineers, combinations of these, etc. >> >> In the last year, I've begun thinking that 99% is a serious underestimate. >> (And it most certainly is in some of the new gTLDs.) >> >> ---rsk >> -- Jason Hellenthal JJH48-ARIN
