Hi, I fully agree with William and it's used in AWS infrastructure (VPC Internet GW IIRW).
Best regards, On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 6:04 PM, William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Arlington Albertson > <arlingtonalbert...@gmail.com> wrote: > > We've filed a support ticket to find out the supported level for this > > range, but I wanted to see if there was anyone out there who'd > experienced > > using the 100.64.0.0/10 space in AWS? > > Hi, > > The Carrier NAT space? The only difference between that and RFC1918 > space is that when you have an address conflict with a third party > using 100.64.0.0/10 it is 100% entirely your fault for > misappropriating it. > > Generally speaking, 100.64.0.0/10 should not be assigned to servers, > only client machines. Assigning it to servers creates a probability of > conflict that the space was meant to solve. > > Regards, > Bill Herrin > > > -- > William Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us > Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> > -- Matthieu MICHAUD
