On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Arlington Albertson <arlingtonalbert...@gmail.com> wrote: > We've filed a support ticket to find out the supported level for this > range, but I wanted to see if there was anyone out there who'd experienced > using the 100.64.0.0/10 space in AWS?
Hi, The Carrier NAT space? The only difference between that and RFC1918 space is that when you have an address conflict with a third party using 100.64.0.0/10 it is 100% entirely your fault for misappropriating it. Generally speaking, 100.64.0.0/10 should not be assigned to servers, only client machines. Assigning it to servers creates a probability of conflict that the space was meant to solve. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
