They don't discriminate, anyone can be a customer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4GfoSZ_sDc
great quote from the reporter "why do you need a court order to do the right thing?" On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Phil Rosenthal <p...@isprime.com> wrote: > Keep in mind also, the victims of these DDoS attacks do not know which > "booter" service was paid to attack them. The packets do not have "Stress > test provided by vBooter" in them. The attack packets do not come from the > booter's or Cloudflare's IP addresses, they come from secondary victims -- > compromised servers, PC's infected with malware, and abused DNS/NTP [and a > few other protocols] reflectors. > > It is impossible for a victim to submit a complaint to Cloudflare stating > "I was attacked by someone paying vBooter", because they do not know which > of the numerous "booter" services was responsible. > > -Phil > > On Jul 28, 2016, at 12:12 PM, Naslund, Steve <snasl...@medline.com> > wrote: > > > > Miles is right. Their thinly veiled "stress tester" thing is not going > to be much of a defense. They must not have very good legal counsel. Here > is the issue. Stress testing is perfectly legal as long as I am: > > > > a) Stress testing my own stuff > > b) Stress testing your stuff WITH YOUR CONSENT > > > > Selling a product or service that is unsafe can lead to serious civil > consequences. For example, I sell you roach killer and don't warn you that > it will also kill every other living thing in your home, I am going to get > sued and lose badly. > > > > Let's say I am running a demolition company that offers to knock down > any house for a price. Don't you think I have a responsibility to verify > that you own the house you just asked me to knock down? (by the way, this > has happened in the real world -wrong address on paperwork- and the > demolition company was held liable) Obviously I have that responsibility > and obviously the same rules would apply to any service that can > potentially damage someone's property. > > > > Steven Naslund > > Chicago IL > > > >> Let's see: > >> > >> Vbooter (on their home page) claims: > >> "#1 FREE WEBBASED SERVER STRESSER" > >> "Using vBooter you can take down home internet connections, websites > and game servers such us Minecraft, XBOX Live, PSN and many more." > >> "You don't have to pay anything in order to use this stresser! In > addition there are NO limits if you are a free user." > > > >> So they're advertising a free service that explicitly offers DDoS > capabilities. > > > >> Now - with the caveat that I'm not a lawyer, and I'm talking from a US > perspective only - as a sometimes hosting provider who pays attention to > our legal liabilities, and >who's had one of our boxes compromised and used > to vector a DDoS against a gaming site.... > > > >> 1. DDoS is clearly illegal under multiple statutes - most notably the > Computer Fraud and Abuse Act - see > https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/criminal- > >ccips/legacy/2015/01/14/ccmanual.pdf > >> - for a Justice Dept. memo on "Prosecuting Computer Crimes." When > coupled with threats, requests for payoffs, etc. - it expands into lots of > other crimes (e.g., >extortion). And that's before one starts attacking > Government-owned computer systems. > >> > >> 2. One might infer that, while "stress testing" is a legitimate and > useful service - under specific circumstances, vBooter's tools might also > fall under laws regarding >being an accomplice to a criminal act, aiding & > abetting, "burglar's tools," etc., and more generally "creating a public > nuisance." > >> > >> 3. There are also various (mostly state) laws against the sale of > burglar's tools (e.g., sale of a lockpick to someone who's not a > professional locksmith). I expect some >of those laws might apply. > >> > >> 4. All of those certainly could be applied to vBooter.org. Whether > Cloudflare is liable for anything would seem to depend on whether > Cloudflare is complicit in the use >of vBooter's use for criminal purposes, > or promoting it's use therefore. Hosting would certainly fall into that > category - and while, I have no direct knowledge that >Cloudflare hosts > vBooter, they do provide nameservice, and their web server's IP address is > in a network block registered to Cloudflare - that would seem to establish > >complicity. Now if Cloudflare were to actively suggest that folks use > vBooter to test systems, as a way to boost sales for Cloudflare - that > would certainly be an >interesting test case for RICO (akin to McAfee > encouraging folks to write and release viruses). > >> > >> As to whether "Nothing is going to happen" - I expect something WILL > happen, when somebody big, with a good legal department, gets hit by a > really damaging DDoS attack, >and starts looking for some deep pockets to > sue. Or, if somebody attacks the wrong Government computer and the FBI, or > DoD, or DHS get ticked off. > >> > >> It will make for very good theater - at least for anyone not directly > in the cross-hairs. > >> > >> Miles Fidelman > > > >