On 9 March 2016 at 20:25, Nick Hilliard <n...@foobar.org> wrote: > any ixp configuration which requires active polling to ensure correct > configuration is doomed to failure. You are completely overestimating > human nature if you believe that the IXP operator can make this work by > harassing people into configuring the correct mtu, even if the data is > clear that their systems are misconfigured.
It's not a novel idea, IXPs already do active polling, even ARP sponges. In a competitive market, hopefully customers will choose the IXP operator who knows how to ensure minimal pain for the customers. -- ++ytti
