On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Todd Underwood <toddun...@gmail.com> wrote: > let me try to be more concrete and helpful: > > lots of people who work at google *and* at cogent are on this list. > none of them are doing anything to look at anything right now b/c > there are no facts in evidence yet. >
happy to help or find a local person to help ... > if you want help with something or want to verify something, provide a > time, a date, a path, a fact, a traceroute, a flow, a log entry a > clue. > if there's more data :( > cheers, > > t > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:54 AM, jim deleskie <deles...@gmail.com> wrote: >> They haven't been since at least the mid 90's :) >> >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Nick Hilliard <n...@foobar.org> wrote: >>> >>> Todd Underwood wrote: >>> > Can you scope "issue" with any facts or data? >>> >>> are facts or data strictly necessary on the nanog mailing list? >>> >>> Nick >>> >>> > T >>> > On Feb 17, 2016 11:16, "Fred Hollis" <f...@web2objects.com> wrote: >>> > >>> >> Anyone else aware of it? >>> >> >>> >>
