Nothing says a better Internet than one the government pokes their nose around in.
----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "William Herrin" <b...@herrin.us> To: "Randy Bush" <ra...@psg.com> Cc: "North American Network Operators' Group" <nanog@nanog.org> Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 5:25:47 PM Subject: Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: > folk can rant on nanog all they want if it > makes them feel good or self-righteous. Hi Randy, It DOES make me feel good. And a little self-righteous. > won't change a damned thing. Some FCC employees read this forum. My impression is that they're not terribly far from concluding that closed peering policies are anti-competitive. When I have such impressions I'm usually off by years. Still, it would be nice if just once an industry cleaned itself up -before- regulators forced the issue. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
