Subject: Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it Date: Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 05:36:13PM -0800 Quoting Owen DeLong (o...@delong.com): > > > On Jan 27, 2016, at 14:43 , Måns Nilsson <mansa...@besserwisser.org> wrote: > > > > Subject: Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane > > Electric - and how to solve it Date: Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:28:01PM +0000 > > Quoting Brandon Butterworth (bran...@rd.bbc.co.uk): > > > >> tier 1 seems consistent with Cogents refusal. > > > > one does not become a tier 1 by refusing to peer. an actual tier 1 will > > of course most of the time refuse settlement-free interconnection with > > smaller actors to protect their revenue stream, but the traffic volumes > > and short settlement-free paths to large parts of the Internet are what > > make them a tier-1. > > I disagree with this last part. So do I, actually. I was just reporting what Tier-1 operators might feel be good for business. Not that I believe that they're right.
-- Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668 On SECOND thought, maybe I'll heat up some BAKED BEANS and watch REGIS PHILBIN ... It's GREAT to be ALIVE!!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
