On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Brandon Butterworth <bran...@rd.bbc.co.uk> wrote:
> > > On Jan 21, 2016, at 1:07 PM, Matthew D. Hardeman < > mharde...@ipifony.com> wrote: > > > Since Cogent is clearly the bad actor here (the burden being > > > Cogent's to prove otherwise because HE is publicly on record as saying > > > that theyd love to peer with Cogent) > > I'd like to peer with all tier 1's, they are thus all bad as > they won't. > > HE decided they want to be transit free for v6 and set out on > a campaign of providing free tunnels/transit/peering to establish > this. Cogent, for all their faults, are free to not accept the > offer. > > Can the Cogent bashing stop now, save it for when they do something > properly bad. > > brandon > Selling a service that is considered internet but does not deliver full internet access is generally considered properly bad. I would not do business with either company, since neither of them provide a full view. CB
