Based over what has been leaked, announced, or passed as pork barrel since 9/11, its probably time a tin foil hat factory was created to speed up the issuance of said hats. On Dec 27, 2015 10:10 PM, "Hugo Slabbert" <h...@slabnet.com> wrote:
> On Sun 2015-Dec-27 20:58:18 -0600, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> > wrote: > > And now that the new bill has passed, they (along with many others) will be >> "mishandling" your data often and legally with 3 letter agencies and other >> corporations. :( >> On Dec 27, 2015 8:48 PM, "James Downs" <e...@egon.cc> wrote: >> >> >>> > On Dec 27, 2015, at 09:43, Hugo Slabbert <h...@slabnet.com> wrote: >>> >>> > Hence: https://on.google.com/hub/ >>> >>> The device looks cool, and sounds cool, but what data does google end up >>> with, and what remote management can they do? Their policy pages aren’t >>> exactly clear, and they’ve mishandled personal data a number of times >>> previously. >>> >>> > Probably wise to be keep the tinfoil hat within arm's reach, I think. My > ref was strictly "yep, they appear to be making a play at the home > controller market via a broadband router trojan horse" and not in any way > an endorsement or comment on the merits of the device. > > -- > Hugo > > h...@slabnet.com: email, xmpp/jabber > PGP fingerprint (B178313E): > CF18 15FA 9FE4 0CD1 2319 1D77 9AB1 0FFD B178 313E > > (also on textsecure & redphone) >
