On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 4:08 AM, Jared Mauch <ja...@puck.nether.net> wrote: >> On Dec 6, 2015, at 2:56 AM, William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: >>> Where the definition of Full Table is everything that isn’t exclusively >>> behind Cogent. >> I thought that was a full table in IPv4 as well? > > The disjoint is IPv4 they can reach each other, but the relationships that > exist for IPv4 aren’t all dual-stacked with congruent policies.
Hi Jared, I was being sarcastic. I would never accept Cogent as my sole service provider because they have a history of getting in to arguments which leave their customers with only a partial view of the Internet. In IPv6 -AND- IPv4. As far as I'm concerned, anyone exclusively on Cogent isn't fully on the Internet and it's not my problem to get them there. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
