We have used ZenOss for a number of years at this scale (40k+ devices, at 
intervals of 1-5 minutes). It is possible to do if you have the hardware and 
storage performance to throw at it. We used OpenNMS before that and had to 
change due to scale. During that time we evaluated a number of the big name and 
big dollar solutions and none of them seemed to scale any better without 
significantly more hardware costs.  
That's not to say ZenOss is perfect, we have plenty of headaches too. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 29, 2015, at 10:40 PM, Joel Whitcomb <joel.whitc...@citrix.com> wrote:
> 
> So we have used www.zenoss.org for many years. Individual collectors are 
> easily handling snmp poll rates of 1.5k oids per second(450k per 5m). As 
> zenoss core is open source Its probably worth a look for you.
> 
> -Joel
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+joel.whitcomb=citrix....@nanog.org] On 
> Behalf Of Pavel Dimow
> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 1:20 PM
> To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
> Subject: SNMP - monitoring large number of devices
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> recently I have been tasked with a NMS project. The idea is to pool about
> 20 OID's from 50k cable modems in less then 5 minutes (yes, I know it's a one 
> million OID's). Before you say check out some very professional and expensive 
> solutions I would like to know are there any alternatives like open source 
> "snmp framework"? To be more descriptive many of you knows how big is the 
> mess with snmp on cable modem. You always first perform snmp walk in order to 
> discover interfaces and then read the values for those interfaces. As cable 
> modem can bundle more DS channels, one time you can have one and other time 
> you can have N+1 DS channels = interfaces. All in all I don't believe that 
> there is something perfect out there when it comes to tracking huge number of 
> cable modems so I would like to know is there any "snmp framework" that can 
> be exteded and how did you (or would you) solve this problem.
> 
> Thank you.

Reply via email to