On 27/Aug/15 17:57, Brandon Ross wrote:
> > > I strongly advise you to not assume that just because an IPv4 address > is "public" (which I'm reading as RFC1918) means that it's not NATed. > > I learned the hard way that Tmobile, for one, squats on other > organization's public IP space on their mobile network and NATs it to > address space they are actually assigned. What you really mean is if > your IPv4 is not NATed, then it should not "feel slow", the type of > address isn't necessarily an indicator. If we're being pedantic, yes. Mark.
