On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 8:16 AM, <valdis.kletni...@vt.edu> wrote: > On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 07:28:08 -0700, Ca By said: > > > Another relevant metric, less than 25% of my mobile subscribers traffic > > require NAT64 translating. 75+% of bits flows through end-to-end IPv6 > > (thanks Google/Youtube, Facebook, Netflix, Yahoo, Linkedin and so on > ...). > > So I'm guessing that 75% of the traffic flows with better latency than > the 25% IPvhorse-n-buggy traffic? ;) > > Facebook says IPv6 is 20-40% faster
http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/blog/2015/04/facebook-news-feeds-load-20-40-faster-over-ipv6/ Another way to look at it, IPv4 is 20-40% slower than IPv6.
