I google¹d ³IPv6 for Dummies² and found this: https://www.wesecure.nl/upload/documents/tinymce/IPv6.pdf It¹s licensed from the For Dummies series, written and published by Infoblox.
more below. . . On 7/14/15, 8:02 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Mike" <nanog-boun...@nanog.org on behalf of mike-na...@tiedyenetworks.com> wrote: > > >On 07/14/2015 04:46 PM, Stephen Satchell wrote: >> This goes back a number of years. There was a product that literally >> was a cardboard box that contained everything one needed to get >> started on the Internet. Just add a modem and a computer, and you >> were on your way. No fuss, no "learning curve". >> >> I'm beginning to think that someone needs to create a similar product, >> but for IPv6 internet. The Internet service providers would provide >> the same sort of kit to get people started. Just add a CSU/DSU (like >> a cable modem) and a computer, and you are on your way. >> >> Also, I think we need a *real* book called "IPv6 for Dummies" (maybe >> even published by IDG Books) that walks through all the beginner >> stuff. There's beginner stuff that I've seen by using a search >> engine; a dead-tree book, though, may well be better for Joe Average. >> >> Just my pair-o-pennies(tm) >> >> > >I am a small provider with a 16 bit asn, a /20 and a /22 of ipv4 and a >/32 of v6, but no clue yet how to get from where I am today to where we >all should be. The flame wars and vitrol and rhetoric is too much noise >for me to derive anything useful from. Someone needs to stand up and >lead. I will happily follow. I also co-authored RFC6782, intended to be guidance for landline ISPs deploying IPv6: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6782 We really tried to make it step-by-step, and you don¹t necessarily need to hit each step (as we explain in the document). > >Whats really needed, is for you gods of ipv6, to write that 'ipv6 for >ipv4 dummies', targeting service providers and telling us exactly what >we need to do. No religious wars about subnet allocation sizes or dhcpv6 >vs slaac or anything. Tell us how to get it onto our network, give us >reasonable deployment scenarios that leverage our experience with IPv4 >and tell us what we are going to tell our customers. Help us understand >WHY nat is not a security model, and how to achieve the same benefits we >have with nat now, in an ipv6 enabled world. Send me private email and we can set up time to talk. I won¹t know the IPv6 capabilities of every piece of equipment you have, but I might be able to help you plan. Lee > >Mike > > > >
