On Tuesday, June 9, 2015, Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com> wrote: > On 06/09/2015 08:37 PM, Karl Auer wrote: > >> On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 23:09 -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: >> >>> How does the device ask for a *second* DHCPv6'ed address for tethering or >>> whatever? >>> >> RFC 3315 says you just chuck in multiple IA_NA (or IA_TA) options. The >> server will respond with multiple addresses. >> >> And if a device makes a second (, third, fourth, ..) request with a >> different DUID, it'll get a second (,third, fourth,...) address oo, I >> guess. >> >> >> > Wouldn't the right thing to do is have the provider support dhcp prefix > delegation, and the tether can run > dhcp for its clients? (or even slaac?) > > Mike >
Well, the OP seems to be interested in campus wifi ... So perhaps we should stick to that first On the other thread, Randy said network operators use a lot of kinky knobs, thats just how it is. If these guys want to run without SLAAC, they can do that and know the outcome . It is just their kink. I dont think andoid will change, and even if they did you will need to wait 5 yeara for theupgrade cycle to push out old clients CB
