Keith, I agree, we can't even get everyone including some LARGE ( I'll avoid Tier's because people get stupid around that too) networks to filter customers based on assigned netblocks.
-jim On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Keith Medcalf <kmedc...@dessus.com> wrote: > > Without a concomitant increase in "trustworthy", assigning greater levels > of trust is fools endeavour. Whatever this trusted network initiative is, > I take that it was designed by fools or government (the two are usually > indistinguishable) for the purpose of creating utterly untrustworthy > networks. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ramy Hashish > > Sent: Sunday, 24 May, 2015 22:49 > > To: morrowc.li...@gmail.com; nanog@nanog.org > > Subject: Re: [SECURITY] Application layer attacks/DDoS attacks > > > > The idea of restricting access to a certain content during an attack on > > the > > "trusted networks" only will make all interested ISPs be more "trusted" > > > > Ramy > > > > On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 5:01 AM, Christopher Morrow > > <morrowc.li...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > > > On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 9:12 PM, jim deleskie <deles...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> However, the trusted network initiative might be a good approach to > > > start > > > >> influencing operators to apply anti-spoofing mechanisms. > > > >> > > > > > > explain how you think the 'trusted network initiative' matters in the > > > slightest? > > > > > > -chris > > > > > > >
