While I don't think any ISP "wants DDoS" to make $$, I do based on experience believe that business cases have to be made for everything. With the prices pay for BW in most of the world now, ( or the last number of years) its going to be VERY hard to get anyone to allocated time/$$ or energy to do anything they don't need to, to get the bit to you.
-jim On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Ramy Hashish <ramy.ihash...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes Harlan, you are absolutely right, even if this won't stop the > botnet-based DDoS attacks, but at least will significantly decrease the > volume/frequency of the volume based attacks. > > On the other side, the DDoS protection now become a business where > all-tiers ISPs make money of, and those ISPs is the exact place where the > implementation of anti-spoofing make the best sense, conflict of interests > now... > > However, the trusted network initiative might be a good approach to start > influencing operators to apply anti-spoofing mechanisms. > > Salam, > > Ramy > On 23 May 2015 10:48 pm, "Harlan Stenn" <st...@ntp.org> wrote: > > Just to ask, what is the expected effect on DDoS attacks if folks > implemented BCP38? > > How does the cost of implementing BCP38 compare to the cost of other > solution attempts? > > H > >
