On 21/02/2015 14:28, Rogers, Josh wrote: > RFC7349 is a nice summary of everything we¹re still missing wrt MPLS and > is relatively recent so should be close to up to date. In addition to the > MPLS shortcomings, it also touches on recent IGP updates:
rfc7439, not 7349: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7439 Nick > >> 3.2.3.1. Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) >> >> RFC 3630 [RFC3630] specifies a method of adding traffic engineering >> capabilities to OSPF Version 2. New TLVs and sub-TLVs were added in >> RFC 5329 [RFC5329] to extend TE capabilities to IPv6 networks in OSPF >> Version 3. >> >> RFC 5305 [RFC5305] specifies a method of adding traffic engineering >> capabilities to IS-IS. New TLVs and sub-TLVs were added in RFC 6119 >> [RFC6119] to extend TE capabilities to IPv6 networks. >> >> Gap: None. > > When you talk to your vendor, ask what code will support these RFC¹s. > > > -Josh > > > >> On 2/21/15, 6:00 AM, "nanog-requ...@nanog.org" <nanog-requ...@nanog.org> >> wrote: >> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Message: 1 >>> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 09:00:07 -0500 >>> From: Tim Durack <tdur...@gmail.com> >>> To: Saku Ytti <s...@ytti.fi> >>> Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>, Juniper-Nsp >>> <juniper-...@puck.nether.net>, "cisco-...@puck.nether.net" >>> <cisco-...@puck.nether.net> >>> Subject: Re: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-16 >>> Message-ID: >>> <cae_ug16fgyqxstuyp9o+utdhdnpgbgfe6h5ebu4tdhb73vm...@mail.gmail.com> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:39 AM, Saku Ytti <s...@ytti.fi> wrote: >>> >>>> On (2015-02-19 11:06 -0500), Tim Durack wrote: >>>> >>>>> What is the chance of getting working code this decade? I would quite >>>> like >>>>> to play with this new fangled IPv6 widget... >>>>> >>>>> (Okay, I'd like to stop using IPv4 for infrastructure. LDP is the last >>>>> piece for me.) >>>> >>>> Is there 4PE implementation to drive IPv4 edges, shouldn't be hard to >>>> accept >>>> IPv6 next-hop in BGP LU, but probably does not work out-of-the-box? >>>> Isn't Segment Routing implementation day1 IPV4+IPV6 in XR? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ++ytti >>>> >>> >>> I would gladly take OSPFv2/OSPFv3/ISIS+SR over LDP, but I'm seeing that >>> is >>> not all that is needed. >>> >>> I also need some flavor of L2VPN (eVPN) and L3VPN (VPNv4/VPNv6) working >>> over IPv6. >>> >>> IPv6 control plane this decade may yet be optimistic. >>> >>> -- >>> Tim:> >>> >> > > > This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable > proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to > copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for > the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not > the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any > dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the > contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be > unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender > immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail > and any printout. >
