Barry Shein <b...@world.std.com> writes: > From: Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> >>> We are now using ZFS RAIDZ and the question I ask myself is, why >>> wasn't I using ZFS years ago? >> >>because it is not production on linux, which i have to use because >>freebsd does not have kvm/ganeti. want zfs very very badly. snif. > > I keep reading zfs vs btrfs articles and...inconclusive. > > My problem with both is I need quotas, both file and "inode", and both > are weaker than ext4 on that, zfs is very weak on this, you can only > sort of simulate them.
By file, you mean "disk space used"? By whom and where? Quotas and reservations on a per-dataset basis are pretty darned well supported in ZFS. As for inodes, well, since there isn't really such a thing as an inode in ZFS... what exactly are you trying to do here? -r
