zfs and ganeti -- Phones are not computers and suck for email
On December 11, 2014 2:39:19 PM GMT+09:00, Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmas...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: >>> We are now using ZFS RAIDZ and the question I ask myself is, why >>> wasn't I using ZFS years ago? >> >> because it is not production on linux, > >Well, it depends on what you mean by >"production". Certainly the ZFS on Linux >group has said in some forums that it is >"production ready", although I would say >that their definition is not exactly the >same as what I mean by the term. > >> which i have to use because >> freebsd does not have kvm/ganeti. > >There is bhyve, and virt-manager can >support bhyve in later versions (but is >disabled by default as I recall). Not >exactly the same, of course. > >> want zfs very very badly. snif. > >Anyone who really cares about their data >wants ZFS. Some just do not yet know >that they (should) want it. > >There is always Illumos/OnmiOS/SmartOS >to consider (depending on your particular >requirements) which can do ZFS and KVM.
